AI Coding Agent Comparison · 2026

Claude Code vs Devin

Claude Code (CLI / terminal agent, $20/mo (Pro) incl. Claude Code) vs Devin (cloud autonomous agent, From $20/mo (Pro)): pricing, models, open-source status, benchmarks, and best use cases. See which AI coding agent is right for your workflow.

Claude Code

Anthropic · CLI / terminal agent
proprietary
$20/mo (Pro) incl. Claude Code

Devin

Cognition · cloud autonomous agent
proprietary
From $20/mo (Pro)
ComparisonClaude CodeDevin
CategoryCLI / terminal agentcloud autonomous agent
TypeTerminal agentCloud autonomous agent
VendorAnthropicCognition
Pricing$20/mo (Pro) incl. Claude CodeFrom $20/mo (Pro)
Open sourceNoNo
ModelsClaude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Haiku 4.5Claude, GPT, Gemini, Cognition SWE-1.6
BenchmarksSWE-bench Verified: 88.6% · Terminal-Bench: 74.6%Not published
Best forDeep reasoning, complex multi-file refactors, debugging across large codebasesDelegated issue work, async PR generation, engineering throughput

Claude Code is proprietary and best for deep reasoning, complex multi-file refactors, debugging across large codebases. Anthropic's terminal-native coding agent. Runs in your terminal, reads your codebase, executes commands, writes and runs tests, and handles multi-file edits. With Opus 4.8 it posts 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified — the highest published score in Anthropic's Opus 4.8 table.

Devin is proprietary and best for delegated issue work, async pr generation, engineering throughput. Cognition's autonomous cloud agent. Assign issues or tasks; Devin works asynchronously — creating branches, writing code, running tests, and opening PRs. Self-serve plans use token quotas (March 2026); Enterprise uses ACUs.

Both tools are part of the 2026 AI coding agent landscape. The right choice depends on whether you need a CLI / terminal agent or a cloud autonomous agent, your budget, and which models you prefer. See the full list of coding agents on our coding agents page to compare more options.