Cursor vs Devin
Cursor (AI IDE, $20/mo (Pro)) vs Devin (cloud autonomous agent, From $20/mo (Pro)): pricing, models, open-source status, benchmarks, and best use cases. See which AI coding agent is right for your workflow.
Cursor
Devin
| Comparison | Cursor | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI IDE | cloud autonomous agent |
| Type | AI IDE | Cloud autonomous agent |
| Vendor | Anysphere | Cognition |
| Pricing | $20/mo (Pro) | From $20/mo (Pro) |
| Open source | No | No |
| Models | Claude Opus 4.8, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok Build, Composer 2.5 | Claude, GPT, Gemini, Cognition SWE-1.6 |
| Benchmarks | Not published | Not published |
| Best for | Full-stack developers wanting the most capable AI-native IDE | Delegated issue work, async PR generation, engineering throughput |
Cursor is proprietary and best for full-stack developers wanting the most capable ai-native ide. The leading AI-native IDE. VS Code fork with codebase-aware context, multi-file Agent mode, background agents, Cloud Agents, and inline Tab completions. Widely adopted among professional developers in 2026.
Devin is proprietary and best for delegated issue work, async pr generation, engineering throughput. Cognition's autonomous cloud agent. Assign issues or tasks; Devin works asynchronously — creating branches, writing code, running tests, and opening PRs. Self-serve plans use token quotas (March 2026); Enterprise uses ACUs.
Both tools are part of the 2026 AI coding agent landscape. The right choice depends on whether you need a AI IDE or a cloud autonomous agent, your budget, and which models you prefer. See the full list of coding agents on our coding agents page to compare more options.