HLE
28.7 score
Compare Qwen3.5 397B vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.
AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.
Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.
28.7 score
88.4 score
92.6 score
76.2 score
83.6 score
46.1 score
80.8 score
79.0 score
83.9 score
Use these comparison links to evaluate Qwen3.5 397B against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.
Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.

Techmeme

Pentagon Adds Alibaba And Baidu To List Of Firms Linked To Chinese Military Latest News AI Apps Computing Mobile Social Media EVs & Transportation Reviews Smartphones Laptops & PCs Gaming Headphones Wearables Photography Tablets Home Buying Guides Laptops Headphones Smart Home Gaming Gaming Nintendo PC PlayStation Xbox Big Tech Amazon Apple Google Meta Microsoft Samsung Entertainment TV & Movies Streaming Cybersecurity VPN Wearables Tomorrow Science Space Robotics Newsletter About Editorial Poli
In the early days of large language models (LLMs), we grew accustomed to massive 10x jumps in reasoning and coding capability with every new model iteration. Today, those jumps have flattened into incremental gains. The exception is domain-specialized intelligence, where true step-function improvements are still the norm. When a model is fused with an organization’s…

Ars Technica
Last cached leaderboard date: June 9, 2026. This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.