LLM Leaderboard · Open Weight

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B benchmarks, pricing, and LLM comparison.

Compare Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.

Rank #29AskClash overall score: 46.9
$0 / $0Input and output token price, when published. Context: 262K.
APIBilling and access path cached for this model row.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B benchmark snapshot

AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.

Overall46.9
Benchmark cells10
Context262K
CreatorAlibaba

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B public benchmark scores

Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.

HLE

21.4 score

GPQA

86.0 score

IFEval

64.4 score

SWE-bench

73.4 score

Terminal-Bench

51.5 score

LiveCodeBench

80.4 score

MCP Atlas

62.8 score

CharXiv

78.0 score

MMMU-Pro

75.3 score

Tau2

95.3 score

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs other AI models

Use these comparison links to evaluate Qwen3.6-35B-A3B against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.

Related AI and tech coverage

Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on my laptop drew me a better pelican than Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on my laptop drew me a better pelican than Claude Opus 4.7 Simon Willison’s Weblog Subscribe Sponsored by: Teleport — Connect agents to your infra in seconds with Teleport Beams. Built-in identity. Zero secrets. Get early access Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on my laptop drew me a better pelican than Claude Opus 4.7 16th April 2026 For anyone who has been (inadvisably) taking my pelican riding a bicycle benchmark seriously as a robust way to test models, here are pelicans from this morning’s t

HuggingFace TRL / RLHF v1.3.0 Release Notes

TRL v1.3 ships training support for the new **Qwen 3.6** family (`Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B`, `Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B`). Qwen 3.6 reuses the `Qwen3_5Moe*` architecture but ships a slightly different chat template (adds a `preserve_thinking` flag, tweaks tool-arg stringification), so exact-string template matching needed updates across the stack. A new experimental `TPOTrainer` implements [Triple Preference Optimization](https://huggingface.co/papers/2405.16681), which augments DPO with a `reference` (gold)

Alibaba Unveils New AI Chip, Upgrades AI Model

The company expects AI-related product revenue to count for 50% of cloud unit's external revenue in about a year, and become the primary driver of revenue growth for that unit, chief executive Eddie Wu said earlier this month. Alibaba's management said in a recent earnings call that scaling up the deployment of its in-house chips represent "the highest value for money compute power," which will improve Alibaba Cloud's margins.

Embedding Tradeoffs, Quantified

Embedding Tradeoffs, Quantified | Vespa Blog { } Blog Vespa.ai Docs Subscribe Vespa Blog We Make AI Work Share Thomas H. Thoresen Senior Software Engineer 14 Jan 2026 Embedding Tradeoffs, Quantified Created by NanoBanana Most Vespa users run hybrid search - combining BM25 (and/or other lexical features) with semantic vectors. But which embedding model should you use? And how do you balance cost, quality, and latency as you scale? The typical approach: open the MTEB leaderboard , find the “Retrie

Last cached leaderboard date: May 25, 2026. This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.