ACB
79.2 score
Compare Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.
AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.
Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.
79.2 score
9.0 score
65.0 score
93.7 score
81.2 score
91.4 score
67.4 score
1853.0 score
58.9 score
90.6 score
90.0 score
Use these comparison links to evaluate Claude Fable 5.1 against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.
Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.

Anthropic launches Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 ChatGPT Gemini Perplexity Claude Grok Copilot Mistral More <a

Ben Patterson / PCWorld : Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 are Anthropic's first models to watermark text outputs; a detection API is available to eligible groups as required under EU law — Anthropic has announced the arrival of its latest Claude models, and ju

Anthropic launches Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, its most capable AI models yet. Fable 5.1 doubles its predecessor's score on Terminal-Bench-Science and improves agentic coding by over 30 percent. Costs drop by up to 45 percent for long, autonomous runs wit

Anthropic Launches Claude Fable 5.1 With Lower Costs and Fewer False Positives - MacRumors
Last cached leaderboard date: . This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.