ACB
79.2 score
LLM Leaderboard · Proprietary
Claude Fable 5.1 benchmarks — leaderboard rank, pricing, and comparisons.
Claude Fable 5.1 ranks #2 on the AskClash LLM leaderboard with an overall score of 78.0. It scores 52.0 on Terminal-Bench. Compare Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.
Rank #2AskClash overall score: 78.0
$10.0 / $50.0Input and output token price, when published. Context: 1M.
Visit websiteVisit the model provider's website.
Claude Fable 5.1 benchmark snapshot
AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.
Overall78.0
Benchmark cells13
Context1M
CreatorAnthropic
Claude Fable 5.1 public benchmark scores
Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.
RWT
9.0 score
HLE
65.0 score
GPQA
93.7 score
SWE-Pro
81.2 score
Terminal-Bench
52.0 score
DeepSWE
67.4 score
GDPval-AA
1853.0 score
Finance Agent
58.9 score
MMMU-Pro
90.6 score
ARC-AGI 2
90.0 score
Claude Fable 5.1 vs other AI models
Use these comparison links to evaluate Claude Fable 5.1 against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.
Related AI and tech coverage
Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.
Meta claims new Muse Wonder AI models rival OpenAI, Anthropic
Meta’s new models are its most expensive to date, with the standard Wonder model charging $4 per million input tokens, matching Claude Opus 5.5 but undercutting GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1, which charge $10 and $50 respectively. Bindu Reddy, CEO of Abacus
Last cached leaderboard date: . This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.