LLM Leaderboard · Proprietary

Claude Fable 5.2 benchmarks — leaderboard rank, pricing, and comparisons.

Claude Fable 5.2 ranks #1 on the AskClash LLM leaderboard with an overall score of 81.6. It scores 59.6 on Terminal-Bench. Compare Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.

Rank #1AskClash overall score: 81.6
$8.00 / $40.0Input and output token price, when published. Context: 1M.
Visit websiteVisit the model provider's website.

Claude Fable 5.2 benchmark snapshot

AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.

Overall81.6
Benchmark cells9
Context1M
CreatorAnthropic

Claude Fable 5.2 public benchmark scores

Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.

ACB

91.4 score

HLE

74.2 score

SWE-Pro

93.0 score

Terminal-Bench

59.6 score

DeepSWE

74.3 score

GDPval-AA

1831.0 score

Claude Fable 5.2 vs other AI models

Use these comparison links to evaluate Claude Fable 5.2 against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.

Related AI and tech coverage

Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.

Anthropic Launches Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2

Anthropic today introduced its latest models, Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, which have improvements in coding, reasoning, and vision. Anthropic says Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 communicate more clearly than the 5.1 versions, with outputs generated up to

Last cached leaderboard date: . This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.