HLE
53.0 score
AI Leaderboard · Proprietary
Claude Opus 4.6 benchmarks, pricing, and ranking.
Rank #8AskClash overall score: 63.2
$5.00 / $25.0Input and output token price, when published. Context: 1M.
API/OAuthBilling and access path cached for this model row.
Claude Opus 4.6 benchmark snapshot
AskClash combines public benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.
Overall63.2
Benchmark cells13
Context1M
CreatorAnthropic
Public benchmark scores
Only benchmark columns with cached public values are shown here. Missing cells remain blank in the live table.
GPQA
91.3 score
MATH-500
98.0 score
SWE-bench
80.8 score
SWE-Pro
11.8 score
Terminal-Bench
70.2 score
OSWorld
72.7 score
MMMU-Pro
77.3 score
ARC-AGI 2
68.8 score
Tau2
84.8 score
Related model comparisons
Use these links to compare nearby frontier and open-weight models from the same AI leaderboard data.
Related AI and tech coverage
Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, or market context around this model.
[AINews] Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 - literally one step better than 4.6 in every dimension
Latent Space
Putnam 2025 Problems in Rocq using Opus 4.6 and Rocq-MCP
Putnam 2025 Problems in Rocq using Opus 4.6 and Rocq-MCP Source: arXiv Logic / Formal Methods URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20405
Opus 4.6, Codex 5.3, and the post-benchmark era
Nathan Lambert - Interconnects
[AINews] Moonshot Kimi K2.6: the world's leading Open Model refreshes to catch up to Opus 4.6 (ahead of DeepSeek v4?)
Latent Space
Last cached leaderboard date: May 22, 2026. This model page is generated from the AskClash AI Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.