LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.7 model pageGemini 3.5 Flash model page
Rank #5 vs #19AskClash overall scores 77.1 vs 56.8.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $1.50/$9.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 3.5 Flash
Overall Score77.156.8
Leaderboard Rank#5#19
RWT8.57.0
Coding Agent Index50.3—
HLE54.740.2
GPQA94.292.2
IFEval—76.3
SWE-bench87.6—
SWE-Pro64.355.1
Terminal-Bench69.476.2
DeepSWE—37.4
OSWorld78.078.4
MCP Atlas77.383.6
Finance Agent64.457.9
CharXiv91.084.2
MMMU-Pro75.283.6
ARC-AGI 275.872.1
Tau288.695.3
MRCR—77.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$9.00
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1415

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.7 leads 8 and Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 5 of 13 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 3.5 Flash
Overall
77.1Claude Opus 4.7
56.8Gemini 3.5 Flash
RWT
8.5Claude Opus 4.7
7.0Gemini 3.5 Flash
HLE
54.7Claude Opus 4.7
40.2Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA
94.2Claude Opus 4.7
92.2Gemini 3.5 Flash
SWE-Pro
64.3Claude Opus 4.7
55.1Gemini 3.5 Flash
Terminal-Bench
69.4Claude Opus 4.7
76.2Gemini 3.5 Flash
OSWorld
78.0Claude Opus 4.7
78.4Gemini 3.5 Flash
MCP Atlas
77.3Claude Opus 4.7
83.6Gemini 3.5 Flash
Finance Agent
64.4Claude Opus 4.7
57.9Gemini 3.5 Flash
CharXiv
91.0Claude Opus 4.7
84.2Gemini 3.5 Flash
MMMU-Pro
75.2Claude Opus 4.7
83.6Gemini 3.5 Flash
ARC-AGI 2
75.8Claude Opus 4.7
72.1Gemini 3.5 Flash
Claude Opus 4.7
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$9.00
Workload$3.30
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.5 Flash comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.5 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.5 FlashClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.5 FlashClaude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.