LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.7 model pageKimi K2.7 model page
Rank #5 vs #30AskClash overall scores 77.1 vs 49.0.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Moonshot AI.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Kimi K2.7
Overall Score77.149.0
Leaderboard Rank#5#30
RWT8.57.5
Coding Agent Index50.3—
HLE54.754.0
GPQA94.290.5
SWE-bench87.680.2
SWE-Pro64.358.6
Terminal-Bench69.466.7
DeepSWE—30.5
OSWorld78.073.1
MCP Atlas77.376.0
Finance Agent64.444.9
CharXiv91.080.4
MMMU-Pro75.279.4
ARC-AGI 275.8—
Tau288.690.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$0.95
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$4.00
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published1414

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.7 leads 11 and Kimi K2.7 leads 2 of 13 shared benchmarks. Kimi K2.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.7Kimi K2.7
Overall
77.1Claude Opus 4.7
49.0Kimi K2.7
RWT
8.5Claude Opus 4.7
7.5Kimi K2.7
HLE
54.7Claude Opus 4.7
54.0Kimi K2.7
GPQA
94.2Claude Opus 4.7
90.5Kimi K2.7
SWE-bench
87.6Claude Opus 4.7
80.2Kimi K2.7
SWE-Pro
64.3Claude Opus 4.7
58.6Kimi K2.7
Terminal-Bench
69.4Claude Opus 4.7
66.7Kimi K2.7
OSWorld
78.0Claude Opus 4.7
73.1Kimi K2.7
MCP Atlas
77.3Claude Opus 4.7
76.0Kimi K2.7
Finance Agent
64.4Claude Opus 4.7
44.9Kimi K2.7
CharXiv
91.0Claude Opus 4.7
80.4Kimi K2.7
MMMU-Pro
75.2Claude Opus 4.7
79.4Kimi K2.7
Claude Opus 4.7
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.7 and Kimi K2.7 comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.7 and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.