LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.7 model pageQwen3.6-27B model page
Rank #6 vs #34AskClash overall scores 76.3 vs 42.4.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $0/$0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7Qwen3.6-27B
Overall Score76.342.4
Leaderboard Rank#6#34
RWT8.5—
Coding Agent Index50.3—
HLE54.724.0
GPQA94.287.8
SWE-bench87.677.2
SWE-Pro64.3—
Terminal-Bench69.459.3
OSWorld78.0—
MCP Atlas77.3—
Finance Agent64.4—
CharXiv91.078.4
MMMU-Pro75.275.8
ARC-AGI 275.8—
Tau288.694.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$0
Context Window1M262K
Benchmarks Published147

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.7 leads 6 and Qwen3.6-27B leads 2 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6-27B is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.7Qwen3.6-27B
Overall
76.3Claude Opus 4.7
42.4Qwen3.6-27B
HLE
54.7Claude Opus 4.7
24.0Qwen3.6-27B
GPQA
94.2Claude Opus 4.7
87.8Qwen3.6-27B
SWE-bench
87.6Claude Opus 4.7
77.2Qwen3.6-27B
Terminal-Bench
69.4Claude Opus 4.7
59.3Qwen3.6-27B
CharXiv
91.0Claude Opus 4.7
78.4Qwen3.6-27B
MMMU-Pro
75.2Claude Opus 4.7
75.8Qwen3.6-27B
Tau2
88.6Claude Opus 4.7
94.2Qwen3.6-27B
Claude Opus 4.7
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Qwen3.6-27B
Input$0
Output$0
Workload$0.00
Context262K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.6-27B comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen3.6-27B stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.6-27BClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.6-27BGPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.6-27BClaude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.6-27BKimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.7Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-27B

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.