LLM Comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardGrok 4.6 model pageClaude Opus 4.8 model page
Rank #5 vs #7AskClash overall scores 76.6 vs 74.7.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $5.00/$25.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryxAI vs Anthropic.

Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGrok 4.6Claude Opus 4.8
Overall Score76.674.7
Leaderboard Rank#5#7
RWT9.09.0
Coding Agent Index76.472.5
HLE40.357.9
GPQA94.993.6
IFEval—62.2
SWE-bench—88.6
SWE-Pro64.769.2
SWE-Atlas83.982.5
Terminal-Bench88.474.6
DeepSWE65.959.0
OSWorld—83.4
MCP Atlas—82.2
Finance Agent48.353.9
CharXiv—89.9
MMMU-Pro80.4—
ARC-AGI 252.672.1
Tau2—94.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$25.0
Context Window500K1M
Benchmarks Published1318

Grok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8 head-to-head charts

Grok 4.6 leads 6 and Claude Opus 4.8 leads 4 of 11 shared benchmarks. Grok 4.6 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Grok 4.6Claude Opus 4.8
Overall
76.6Grok 4.6
74.7Claude Opus 4.8
RWT
9.0Grok 4.6
9.0Claude Opus 4.8
Coding Agent Index
76.4Grok 4.6
72.5Claude Opus 4.8
HLE
40.3Grok 4.6
57.9Claude Opus 4.8
GPQA
94.9Grok 4.6
93.6Claude Opus 4.8
SWE-Pro
64.7Grok 4.6
69.2Claude Opus 4.8
SWE-Atlas
83.9Grok 4.6
82.5Claude Opus 4.8
Terminal-Bench
88.4Grok 4.6
74.6Claude Opus 4.8
DeepSWE
65.9Grok 4.6
59.0Claude Opus 4.8
Finance Agent
48.3Grok 4.6
53.9Claude Opus 4.8
ARC-AGI 2
52.6Grok 4.6
72.1Claude Opus 4.8
Grok 4.6
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context500K
Claude Opus 4.8
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Grok 4.6 and Claude Opus 4.8 comparisons

Explore how Grok 4.6 and Claude Opus 4.8 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.6Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.8Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.