LLM Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Max: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Opus 4.8 model pageQwen3.7 Max model page
Rank #4 vs #11AskClash overall scores 80.2 vs 70.7.
Pricing $5.00/$25.0 vs $2.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Max benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3.7 Max
Overall Score80.270.7
Leaderboard Rank#4#11
RWT9.07.5
Coding Agent Index72.5—
HLE57.941.4
GPQA93.692.4
IFEval62.294.3
SWE-bench88.680.4
SWE-Pro69.2—
SWE-Atlas82.5—
Terminal-Bench74.669.7
DeepSWE59.0—
OSWorld83.4—
MCP Atlas82.276.4
Finance Agent53.948.4
CharXiv89.9—
ARC-AGI 272.1—
Tau294.494.7
MRCR—90.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$2.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$25.0$7.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1711

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Max head-to-head charts

Claude Opus 4.8 leads 8 and Qwen3.7 Max leads 2 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Opus 4.8Qwen3.7 Max
Overall
80.2Claude Opus 4.8
70.7Qwen3.7 Max
RWT
9.0Claude Opus 4.8
7.5Qwen3.7 Max
HLE
57.9Claude Opus 4.8
41.4Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA
93.6Claude Opus 4.8
92.4Qwen3.7 Max
IFEval
62.2Claude Opus 4.8
94.3Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench
88.6Claude Opus 4.8
80.4Qwen3.7 Max
Terminal-Bench
74.6Claude Opus 4.8
69.7Qwen3.7 Max
MCP Atlas
82.2Claude Opus 4.8
76.4Qwen3.7 Max
Finance Agent
53.9Claude Opus 4.8
48.4Qwen3.7 Max
Tau2
94.4Claude Opus 4.8
94.7Qwen3.7 Max
Claude Opus 4.8
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Qwen3.7 Max
Input$2.50
Output$7.50
Workload$4.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3.7 Max comparisons

Explore how Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3.7 Max stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxGPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 MaxKimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.5Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.