LLM Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks higher (#6 vs #41) and wins 7 of 7 shared benchmarks; Gemini 3.6 Flash costs less ($1.50/$7.50 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).

Rank #6 vs #41AskClash overall scores 73.7 vs 49.8.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.6 Flash
Overall Score73.749.8
Leaderboard Rank#6#41
ACB76.633.8
HLE64.538.0
GPQA—92.8
SWE-Pro81.358.7
Terminal-Bench83.278.0
DeepSWE71.046.7
GDPval-AA1844.21421.0
OSWorld—83.0
Finance Agent58.156.3
CharXiv—85.2
MMMU-Pro—83.2
ARC-AGI 2—60.4
MRCR—91.8
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$7.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1014

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash head-to-head charts

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 8 and Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 0 of 8 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.6 Flash
Overall
73.7Claude Sonnet 5.5
49.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
ACB
76.6Claude Sonnet 5.5
33.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
HLE
64.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
38.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
SWE-Pro
81.3Claude Sonnet 5.5
58.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
Terminal-Bench
83.2Claude Sonnet 5.5
78.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSWE
71.0Claude Sonnet 5.5
46.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
GDPval-AA
1844.2Claude Sonnet 5.5
1421.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
Finance Agent
58.1Claude Sonnet 5.5
56.3Gemini 3.6 Flash
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1M
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash comparisons

Explore how Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.