LLM Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.2: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.2 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks higher (#6 vs #31) and wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks; GLM-5.2 costs less ($1.40/$4.40 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardClaude Sonnet 5.5 model pageGLM-5.2 model page
Rank #6 vs #31AskClash overall scores 73.7 vs 56.6.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $1.40/$4.40Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightAnthropic vs Z.AI.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.2 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.2
Overall Score73.756.6
Leaderboard Rank#6#31
ACB76.6—
RWT—8.5
Coding Agent Index—74.4
HLE64.554.7
GPQA—91.2
IFEval—73.3
SWE-Pro81.362.1
SWE-Atlas—74.4
Terminal-Bench83.282.7
DeepSWE71.043.8
GDPval-AA1844.21357.5
MCP Atlas—76.8
Finance Agent58.149.7
Tau2—99.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$1.40
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$4.40
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1013

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.2 head-to-head charts

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 7 and GLM-5.2 leads 0 of 7 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.2 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.2
Overall
73.7Claude Sonnet 5.5
56.6GLM-5.2
HLE
64.5Claude Sonnet 5.5
54.7GLM-5.2
SWE-Pro
81.3Claude Sonnet 5.5
62.1GLM-5.2
Terminal-Bench
83.2Claude Sonnet 5.5
82.7GLM-5.2
DeepSWE
71.0Claude Sonnet 5.5
43.8GLM-5.2
GDPval-AA
1844.2Claude Sonnet 5.5
1357.5GLM-5.2
Finance Agent
58.1Claude Sonnet 5.5
49.7GLM-5.2
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1M
GLM-5.2
Input$1.40
Output$4.40
Workload$2.28
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5.2 comparisons

Explore how Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GLM-5.2 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM-5.2Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.2GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.2

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.