How do Composer 2.5 and SWE-1.7 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Composer 2.5 and SWE-1.7 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Composer 2.5 vs SWE-1.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Composer 2.5 or SWE-1.7?

AskClash compares Composer 2.5 and SWE-1.7 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Composer 2.5 vs SWE-1.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Composer 2.5 model page SWE-1.7 model page

Rank #14 vs #46AskClash overall scores 67.0 vs 26.4.

Pricing $0.50/$2.50 vs $0/$0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryCursor vs Cognition.

Composer 2.5 vs SWE-1.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Composer 2.5	SWE-1.7
Overall Score	67.0	26.4
Leaderboard Rank	#14	#46
RWT	8.5	8.5
Coding Agent Index	51.8	—
SWE-Pro	47.0	—
SWE-Atlas	72.0	—
Terminal-Bench	69.3	81.5
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.50	$0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.50	$0
Context Window	200K	256K
Benchmarks Published	4	1

Composer 2.5 vs SWE-1.7 head-to-head charts

Composer 2.5 leads 1 and SWE-1.7 leads 1 of 3 shared benchmarks. SWE-1.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Composer 2.5SWE-1.7

Overall

67.0Composer 2.5

26.4SWE-1.7

RWT

8.5Composer 2.5

8.5SWE-1.7

Terminal-Bench

69.3Composer 2.5

81.5SWE-1.7

Composer 2.5

Input$0.50

Output$2.50

Workload$1.00

Context200K

SWE-1.7

Input$0

Output$0

Workload$0.00

Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Composer 2.5 and SWE-1.7 comparisons

Explore how Composer 2.5 and SWE-1.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Fable 5 vs SWE-1.7 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Composer 2.5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs SWE-1.7 Kimi K3 vs Composer 2.5 Kimi K3 vs SWE-1.7 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs SWE-1.7 Grok 4.5 vs Composer 2.5 Grok 4.5 vs SWE-1.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.