Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Composer 2.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Composer 2.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher (#64 vs #138) and wins 1 of 1 shared benchmarks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.60 vs $0.50/$2.50 per 1M tokens).
Rank #64 vs #138AskClash overall scores 57.3 vs 30.0.
Pricing $0.15/$0.60 vs $0.50/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Cursor.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Composer 2.5 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Composer 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.3 | 30.0 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #64 | #138 |
| ACB | 63.0 | 53.2 |
| RWT | — | 8.5 |
| Coding Agent Index | — | 62.0 |
| HLE | 36.8 | — |
| GPQA | 90.9 | — |
| SWE-Pro | — | 47.0 |
| SWE-Atlas | — | 72.0 |
| Terminal-Bench | 26.8 | — |
| DeepSWE | 74.2 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1600.0 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 77.0 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.50 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $2.50 |
| Context Window | 1M | 200K |
| Benchmarks Published | 10 | 4 |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Composer 2.5 head-to-head charts
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 2 and Composer 2.5 leads 0 of 2 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashComposer 2.5
Overall
ACB
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
Composer 2.5
Input$0.50
Output$2.50
Workload$1.00
Context200K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Composer 2.5 comparisons
Explore how DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Composer 2.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Composer 2.5Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Composer 2.5Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Composer 2.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Composer 2.5Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Composer 2.5
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.