Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher (#16 vs #30); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.60 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #16 vs #30AskClash overall scores 65.5 vs 58.1.
Pricing $0.15/$0.60 vs $2.00/$10.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs OpenAI.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 65.5 | 58.1 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #16 | #30 |
| ACB | 63.0 | 61.9 |
| HLE | 36.8 | — |
| GPQA | 90.9 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 90.6 | — |
| DeepSWE | 74.2 | 75.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1600.0 | — |
| Finance Agent | 53.5 | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 77.0 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $2.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $10.0 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Benchmarks Published | 11 | 3 |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol head-to-head charts
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 2 and GPT-6.1 Sol leads 1 of 3 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol
Overall
ACB
DeepSWE
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
GPT-6.1 Sol
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1.05M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-6.1 Sol comparisons
Explore how DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-6.1 Sol stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Sol
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.