Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks higher (#30 vs #33); DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.60 vs $2.00/$6.00 per 1M tokens).
Rank #30 vs #33AskClash overall scores 51.7 vs 49.9.
Pricing $0.15/$0.60 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs xAI.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 51.7 | 49.9 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #30 | #33 |
| ACB | 63.0 | 66.4 |
| HLE | 36.8 | — |
| GPQA | 90.9 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 26.8 | 25.8 |
| DeepSWE | 74.2 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $2.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $6.00 |
| Context Window | 1M | 500K |
| Benchmarks Published | 5 | 4 |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.7 head-to-head charts
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 2 and Grok 4.7 leads 1 of 3 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.7
Overall
ACB
Terminal-Bench
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
Grok 4.7
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context500K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 comparisons
Explore how DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Grok 4.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.7
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.