LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardDeepSeek V4.1 Flash model pageMuse Spark 1.3 model page
Rank #14 vs #17AskClash overall scores 64.2 vs 63.8.
Pricing $0.15/$0.60 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Meta.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3
Overall Score64.263.8
Leaderboard Rank#14#17
ACB63.055.5
RWT—7.5
Coding Agent Index—54.3
HLE36.849.1
GPQA90.993.8
SWE-Atlas—59.4
Terminal-Bench90.688.8
DeepSWE74.275.4
GDPval-AA1632.11754.0
Finance Agent53.558.9
MMMU-Pro77.0—
MRCR—98.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.15$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.60$4.25
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published911

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 3 and Muse Spark 1.3 leads 5 of 8 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3
Overall
64.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
63.8Muse Spark 1.3
ACB
63.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
55.5Muse Spark 1.3
HLE
36.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
49.1Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA
90.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
93.8Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench
90.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
88.8Muse Spark 1.3
DeepSWE
74.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
75.4Muse Spark 1.3
GDPval-AA
1632.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
1754.0Muse Spark 1.3
Finance Agent
53.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
58.9Muse Spark 1.3
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
Muse Spark 1.3
Input$1.25
Output$4.25
Workload$2.10
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.8 Max vs Muse Spark 1.3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.