Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Composer 2.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Composer 2.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Rank #15 vs #50AskClash overall scores 61.1 vs 23.6.
Pricing $0.43/$0.87 vs $0.50/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Cursor.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Composer 2.5 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | Composer 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 61.1 | 23.6 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #15 | #50 |
| ACB | 54.7 | 53.2 |
| RWT | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Coding Agent Index | — | 38.2 |
| HLE | 42.7 | — |
| GPQA | 90.1 | — |
| SWE-bench | 80.6 | — |
| SWE-Pro | 55.4 | 47.0 |
| SWE-Atlas | — | 72.0 |
| Terminal-Bench | 87.9 | 69.3 |
| DeepSWE | 62.7 | — |
| MCP Atlas | 73.6 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.43 | $0.50 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.87 | $2.50 |
| Context Window | 1M | 200K |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 5 |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Composer 2.5 head-to-head charts
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads 4 and Composer 2.5 leads 1 of 5 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Composer 2.5
Overall
ACB
RWT
SWE-Pro
Terminal-Bench
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Input$0.43
Output$0.87
Workload$0.61
Context1M
Composer 2.5
Input$0.50
Output$2.50
Workload$1.00
Context200K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Composer 2.5 comparisons
Explore how DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Composer 2.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Claude Opus 5 vs Composer 2.5Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Claude Fable 5 vs Composer 2.5GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-5.6 Sol vs Composer 2.5Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3 vs Composer 2.5Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Grok 4.6 vs Composer 2.5
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.