Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Rank #15 vs #23AskClash overall scores 61.1 vs 49.2.
Pricing $0.43/$0.87 vs $0.75/$2.95Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightDeepSeek vs Meituan.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | LongCat 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 61.1 | 49.2 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #15 | #23 |
| ACB | 54.7 | — |
| RWT | 7.0 | — |
| HLE | 42.7 | — |
| GPQA | 90.1 | 88.9 |
| IFEval | — | 90.0 |
| SWE-bench | 80.6 | — |
| SWE-Pro | 55.4 | 59.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 87.9 | 70.8 |
| DeepSWE | 62.7 | — |
| MCP Atlas | 73.6 | — |
| Tau2 | — | 88.2 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.43 | $0.75 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.87 | $2.95 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 5 |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs LongCat 2.0 head-to-head charts
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads 3 and LongCat 2.0 leads 1 of 4 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813LongCat 2.0
Overall
GPQA
SWE-Pro
Terminal-Bench
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Input$0.43
Output$0.87
Workload$0.61
Context1M
LongCat 2.0
Input$0.75
Output$2.95
Workload$1.34
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and LongCat 2.0 comparisons
Explore how DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and LongCat 2.0 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Claude Opus 5 vs LongCat 2.0Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Claude Fable 5 vs LongCat 2.0GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-5.6 Sol vs LongCat 2.0Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Kimi K3 vs LongCat 2.0Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Grok 4.6 vs LongCat 2.0
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.