LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher (#35 vs #64) and wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.60 vs $1.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardGemini 3.8 Flash model pageDeepSeek V4.1 Flash model page
Rank #35 vs #64AskClash overall scores 61.6 vs 57.3.
Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs $0.15/$0.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs APIGoogle vs DeepSeek.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGemini 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Overall Score61.657.3
Leaderboard Rank#35#64
ACB64.263.0
HLE54.936.8
GPQA95.390.9
Terminal-Bench19.726.8
DeepSWE73.874.2
GDPval-AA1545.01600.0
Finance Agent61.4—
CharXiv86.2—
MMMU-Pro85.677.0
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$0.15
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$0.60
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1210

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 5 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 3 of 8 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Overall
61.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
57.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ACB
64.2Gemini 3.8 Flash
63.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
HLE
54.9Gemini 3.8 Flash
36.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA
95.3Gemini 3.8 Flash
90.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Terminal-Bench
19.7Gemini 3.8 Flash
26.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DeepSWE
73.8Gemini 3.8 Flash
74.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GDPval-AA
1545.0Gemini 3.8 Flash
1600.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
MMMU-Pro
85.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
77.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.8 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.8 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 3.8 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.