LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher (#33 vs #100) and wins 4 of 4 shared benchmarks.

Rank #33 vs #100AskClash overall scores 61.9 vs 49.5.
Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs —/—Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightsGoogle vs Google.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash
Overall Score61.949.5
Leaderboard Rank#33#100
ACB64.2—
RWT—7.0
HLE54.942.7
GPQA95.392.2
IFEval—76.3
Terminal-Bench19.7—
DeepSWE73.8—
GDPval-AA1545.01202.6
Finance Agent61.4—
CharXiv86.2—
MMMU-Pro85.684.3
ARC-AGI 2—72.1
Tau2—95.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.50—
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50—
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published128

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.8 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash
Overall
61.9Gemini 3.8 Flash
49.5Gemini 3.5 Flash
HLE
54.9Gemini 3.8 Flash
42.7Gemini 3.5 Flash
GPQA
95.3Gemini 3.8 Flash
92.2Gemini 3.5 Flash
GDPval-AA
1545.0Gemini 3.8 Flash
1202.6Gemini 3.5 Flash
MMMU-Pro
85.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
84.3Gemini 3.5 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input—
Output—
Workload—
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.