LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardGemini 3.8 Flash model pageKimi K2.7 model page
Rank #8 vs #32AskClash overall scores 71.1 vs 42.3.
Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightGoogle vs Moonshot AI.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2.7
Overall Score71.142.3
Leaderboard Rank#8#32
ACB—43.0
RWT—7.5
HLE54.954.0
GPQA94.590.5
SWE-bench—80.2
SWE-Pro—58.6
Terminal-Bench89.466.7
DeepSWE71.030.5
GDPval-AA1545.0—
OSWorld—73.1
MCP Atlas—76.0
Finance Agent61.444.9
CharXiv86.280.4
MMMU-Pro85.579.4
Tau2—90.1
MRCR97.0—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$0.95
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$4.00
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published1014

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 8 and Kimi K2.7 leads 0 of 8 shared benchmarks. Kimi K2.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2.7
Overall
71.1Gemini 3.8 Flash
42.3Kimi K2.7
HLE
54.9Gemini 3.8 Flash
54.0Kimi K2.7
GPQA
94.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
90.5Kimi K2.7
Terminal-Bench
89.4Gemini 3.8 Flash
66.7Kimi K2.7
DeepSWE
71.0Gemini 3.8 Flash
30.5Kimi K2.7
Finance Agent
61.4Gemini 3.8 Flash
44.9Kimi K2.7
CharXiv
86.2Gemini 3.8 Flash
80.4Kimi K2.7
MMMU-Pro
85.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
79.4Kimi K2.7
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2.7 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7GLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashGLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2.7Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashGrok 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.