Which is better: Gemini 4 Argon or Claude Opus 4.8?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Argon ranks higher (#6 vs #17) and wins 4 of 6 shared benchmarks; Gemini 4 Argon costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $5.00/$25.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Argon and Claude Opus 4.8 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Argon and Claude Opus 4.8 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Argon and Claude Opus 4.8 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 4.8: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 4.8 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Argon ranks higher (#6 vs #17) and wins 4 of 6 shared benchmarks; Gemini 4 Argon costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $5.00/$25.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Argon model page Claude Opus 4.8 model page

Rank #6 vs #17AskClash overall scores 72.2 vs 60.0.

Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $5.00/$25.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs Anthropic.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Argon	Claude Opus 4.8
Overall Score	72.2	60.0
Leaderboard Rank	#6	#17
ACB	74.8	60.1
RWT	—	9.0
Coding Agent Index	—	72.5
HLE	57.1	57.9
GPQA	—	93.6
IFEval	—	62.2
SWE-bench	—	88.6
SWE-Pro	—	69.2
SWE-Atlas	—	82.5
Terminal-Bench	57.1	21.7
DeepSWE	77.9	59.0
GDPval-AA	1624.0	1889.8
OSWorld	—	83.4
MCP Atlas	—	82.2
Finance Agent	65.4	53.9
CharXiv	—	89.9
ARC-AGI 2	—	72.1
Tau2	—	94.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$25.0
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	16

Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 4.8 head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Argon leads 5 and Claude Opus 4.8 leads 2 of 7 shared benchmarks. Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Opus 4.8

Overall

72.2Gemini 4 Argon

60.0Claude Opus 4.8

ACB

74.8Gemini 4 Argon

60.1Claude Opus 4.8

HLE

57.1Gemini 4 Argon

57.9Claude Opus 4.8

Terminal-Bench

57.1Gemini 4 Argon

21.7Claude Opus 4.8

DeepSWE

77.9Gemini 4 Argon

59.0Claude Opus 4.8

GDPval-AA

1624.0Gemini 4 Argon

1889.8Claude Opus 4.8

Finance Agent

65.4Gemini 4 Argon

53.9Claude Opus 4.8

Gemini 4 Argon

Input$2.00

Output$10.0

Workload$4.00

Context1M

Claude Opus 4.8

Input$5.00

Output$25.0

Workload$10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Argon and Claude Opus 4.8 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Argon and Claude Opus 4.8 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.