Which is better: Gemini 4 Argon or Kimi K3?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Argon ranks higher (#6 vs #28) and wins 5 of 6 shared benchmarks; Gemini 4 Argon costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $3.00/$15.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Argon and Kimi K3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Argon and Kimi K3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Argon and Kimi K3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Argon ranks higher (#6 vs #28) and wins 5 of 6 shared benchmarks; Gemini 4 Argon costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $3.00/$15.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Argon model page Kimi K3 model page

Rank #6 vs #28AskClash overall scores 72.1 vs 55.7.

Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightGoogle vs Moonshot AI.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Argon	Kimi K3
Overall Score	72.1	55.7
Leaderboard Rank	#6	#28
ACB	74.8	57.7
RWT	—	8.0
Coding Agent Index	—	51.9
HLE	57.1	43.5
GPQA	—	93.5
SWE-Atlas	—	66.1
Terminal-Bench	57.1	12.6
DeepSWE	77.9	68.5
GDPval-AA	1624.0	1668.0
MCP Atlas	—	84.2
Finance Agent	65.4	53.1
CharXiv	—	84.8
MMMU-Pro	—	81.6
ARC-AGI 2	—	60.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$15.0
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	16

Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3 head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Argon leads 6 and Kimi K3 leads 1 of 7 shared benchmarks. Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 ArgonKimi K3

Overall

72.1Gemini 4 Argon

55.7Kimi K3

ACB

74.8Gemini 4 Argon

57.7Kimi K3

HLE

57.1Gemini 4 Argon

43.5Kimi K3

Terminal-Bench

57.1Gemini 4 Argon

12.6Kimi K3

DeepSWE

77.9Gemini 4 Argon

68.5Kimi K3

GDPval-AA

1624.0Gemini 4 Argon

1668.0Kimi K3

Finance Agent

65.4Gemini 4 Argon

53.1Kimi K3

Gemini 4 Argon

Input$2.00

Output$10.0

Workload$4.00

Context1M

Kimi K3

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Argon and Kimi K3 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Argon and Kimi K3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.