Which is better: Gemini 4 Carbon or Claude Haiku 5.5?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #26) and wins 7 of 7 shared benchmarks; Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Haiku 5.5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Haiku 5.5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Haiku 5.5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Haiku 5.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Haiku 5.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #26) and wins 7 of 7 shared benchmarks; Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Carbon model page Claude Haiku 5.5 model page

Rank #5 vs #26AskClash overall scores 73.8 vs 53.8.

Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $0.10/$0.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs Anthropic.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Haiku 5.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Carbon	Claude Haiku 5.5
Overall Score	73.8	53.8
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#26
ACB	80.8	63.5
Coding Agent Index	59.4	37.3
HLE	60.4	57.4
SWE-Pro	—	64.8
SWE-Atlas	63.7	33.9
Terminal-Bench	65.2	32.8
GDPval-AA	1732.7	1620.0
Finance Agent	67.2	65.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.00	$0.10
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$20.0	$0.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	11

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Haiku 5.5 head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Carbon leads 8 and Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 0 of 8 shared benchmarks. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Haiku 5.5

Overall

73.8Gemini 4 Carbon

53.8Claude Haiku 5.5

ACB

80.8Gemini 4 Carbon

63.5Claude Haiku 5.5

Coding Agent Index

59.4Gemini 4 Carbon

37.3Claude Haiku 5.5

HLE

60.4Gemini 4 Carbon

57.4Claude Haiku 5.5

SWE-Atlas

63.7Gemini 4 Carbon

33.9Claude Haiku 5.5

Terminal-Bench

65.2Gemini 4 Carbon

32.8Claude Haiku 5.5

GDPval-AA

1732.7Gemini 4 Carbon

1620.0Claude Haiku 5.5

Finance Agent

67.2Gemini 4 Carbon

65.4Claude Haiku 5.5

Gemini 4 Carbon

Input$4.00

Output$20.0

Workload$8.00

Context1M

Claude Haiku 5.5

Input$0.10

Output$0.50

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Haiku 5.5 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Haiku 5.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Haiku 5.5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.