Which is better: Gemini 4 Carbon or Claude Opus 5?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #7); Gemini 4 Carbon costs less ($4.00/$20.0 vs $5.00/$25.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Opus 5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Opus 5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Opus 5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #7); Gemini 4 Carbon costs less ($4.00/$20.0 vs $5.00/$25.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Carbon model page Claude Opus 5 model page

Rank #5 vs #7AskClash overall scores 73.8 vs 70.2.

Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $5.00/$25.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs Anthropic.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Carbon	Claude Opus 5
Overall Score	73.8	70.2
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#7
ACB	80.8	70.5
RWT	—	9.0
Coding Agent Index	59.4	—
HLE	60.4	64.7
GPQA	—	93.2
SWE-bench	—	96.0
SWE-Pro	—	79.2
SWE-Atlas	63.7	—
Terminal-Bench	65.2	49.0
DeepSWE	—	73.6
GDPval-AA	1732.7	1861.0
MCP Atlas	—	85.8
Finance Agent	67.2	—
MMMU-Pro	—	84.7
ARC-AGI 2	—	90.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.00	$5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$20.0	$25.0
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	13

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Opus 5 head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Carbon leads 3 and Claude Opus 5 leads 2 of 5 shared benchmarks. Gemini 4 Carbon is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Opus 5

Overall

73.8Gemini 4 Carbon

70.2Claude Opus 5

ACB

80.8Gemini 4 Carbon

70.5Claude Opus 5

HLE

60.4Gemini 4 Carbon

64.7Claude Opus 5

Terminal-Bench

65.2Gemini 4 Carbon

49.0Claude Opus 5

GDPval-AA

1732.7Gemini 4 Carbon

1861.0Claude Opus 5

Gemini 4 Carbon

Input$4.00

Output$20.0

Workload$8.00

Context1M

Claude Opus 5

Input$5.00

Output$25.0

Workload$10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Opus 5 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Carbon and Claude Opus 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5 Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.