Which is better: Gemini 4 Carbon or GPT-6.1 Sol?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #8) and wins 7 of 7 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Sol costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6.1 Sol side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6.1 Sol compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6.1 Sol when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #8) and wins 7 of 7 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Sol costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Carbon model page GPT-6.1 Sol model page

Rank #5 vs #8AskClash overall scores 73.8 vs 69.3.

Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $2.00/$10.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs OpenAI.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Carbon	GPT-6.1 Sol
Overall Score	73.8	69.3
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#8
ACB	80.8	69.9
Coding Agent Index	59.4	54.1
HLE	60.4	52.9
GPQA	—	95.0
SWE-Atlas	63.7	59.9
Terminal-Bench	65.2	56.1
DeepSWE	—	75.2
GDPval-AA	1732.7	1575.1
Finance Agent	67.2	61.8
MMMU-Pro	—	86.0
ARC-AGI 2	—	94.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.00	$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$20.0	$10.0
Context Window	1M	1.05M
Benchmarks Published	10	14

Gemini 4 Carbon vs GPT-6.1 Sol head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Carbon leads 8 and GPT-6.1 Sol leads 0 of 8 shared benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Sol

Overall

73.8Gemini 4 Carbon

69.3GPT-6.1 Sol

ACB

80.8Gemini 4 Carbon

69.9GPT-6.1 Sol

Coding Agent Index

59.4Gemini 4 Carbon

54.1GPT-6.1 Sol

HLE

60.4Gemini 4 Carbon

52.9GPT-6.1 Sol

SWE-Atlas

63.7Gemini 4 Carbon

59.9GPT-6.1 Sol

Terminal-Bench

65.2Gemini 4 Carbon

56.1GPT-6.1 Sol

GDPval-AA

1732.7Gemini 4 Carbon

1575.1GPT-6.1 Sol

Finance Agent

67.2Gemini 4 Carbon

61.8GPT-6.1 Sol

Gemini 4 Carbon

Input$4.00

Output$20.0

Workload$8.00

Context1M

GPT-6.1 Sol

Input$2.00

Output$10.0

Workload$4.00

Context1.05M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6.1 Sol comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Carbon and GPT-6.1 Sol stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.