Which is better: Gemini 4 Carbon or Grok 4.7?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #29) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; Grok 4.7 costs less ($2.00/$6.00 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Carbon and Grok 4.7 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Carbon and Grok 4.7 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Carbon and Grok 4.7 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Grok 4.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Carbon vs Grok 4.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #29) and wins 5 of 5 shared benchmarks; Grok 4.7 costs less ($2.00/$6.00 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Carbon model page Grok 4.7 model page

Rank #5 vs #29AskClash overall scores 73.8 vs 51.5.

Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs xAI.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Grok 4.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Carbon	Grok 4.7
Overall Score	73.8	51.5
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#29
ACB	80.8	66.4
Coding Agent Index	59.4	46.6
HLE	60.4	—
SWE-Atlas	63.7	62.9
Terminal-Bench	65.2	25.8
GDPval-AA	1732.7	—
Finance Agent	67.2	60.6
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.00	$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$20.0	$6.00
Context Window	1M	500K
Benchmarks Published	10	7

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Grok 4.7 head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Carbon leads 6 and Grok 4.7 leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. Grok 4.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 CarbonGrok 4.7

Overall

73.8Gemini 4 Carbon

51.5Grok 4.7

ACB

80.8Gemini 4 Carbon

66.4Grok 4.7

Coding Agent Index

59.4Gemini 4 Carbon

46.6Grok 4.7

SWE-Atlas

63.7Gemini 4 Carbon

62.9Grok 4.7

Terminal-Bench

65.2Gemini 4 Carbon

25.8Grok 4.7

Finance Agent

67.2Gemini 4 Carbon

60.6Grok 4.7

Gemini 4 Carbon

Input$4.00

Output$20.0

Workload$8.00

Context1M

Grok 4.7

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context500K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Carbon and Grok 4.7 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Carbon and Grok 4.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.2 vs Grok 4.7 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.7 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7 Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.