Which is better: Gemini 4 Carbon or MiniMax-M3?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #49) and wins 4 of 4 shared benchmarks; MiniMax-M3 costs less ($0.30/$1.20 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax-M3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax-M3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax-M3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax-M3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax-M3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #49) and wins 4 of 4 shared benchmarks; MiniMax-M3 costs less ($0.30/$1.20 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Carbon model page MiniMax-M3 model page

Rank #5 vs #49AskClash overall scores 73.8 vs 30.9.

Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $0.30/$1.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs MiniMax.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax-M3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Carbon	MiniMax-M3
Overall Score	73.8	30.9
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#49
ACB	80.8	29.8
RWT	—	8.5
Coding Agent Index	59.4	—
HLE	60.4	37.1
GPQA	—	92.9
IFEval	—	82.9
SWE-bench	—	80.5
SWE-Pro	—	59.0
SWE-Atlas	63.7	—
Terminal-Bench	65.2	—
GDPval-AA	1732.7	58.4
OSWorld	—	70.1
MCP Atlas	—	74.2
Finance Agent	67.2	54.3
MMMU-Pro	—	78.6
Tau2	—	88.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.00	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$20.0	$1.20
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	11

Gemini 4 Carbon vs MiniMax-M3 head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Carbon leads 5 and MiniMax-M3 leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. MiniMax-M3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 CarbonMiniMax-M3

Overall

73.8Gemini 4 Carbon

30.9MiniMax-M3

ACB

80.8Gemini 4 Carbon

29.8MiniMax-M3

HLE

60.4Gemini 4 Carbon

37.1MiniMax-M3

GDPval-AA

1732.7Gemini 4 Carbon

58.4MiniMax-M3

Finance Agent

67.2Gemini 4 Carbon

54.3MiniMax-M3

Gemini 4 Carbon

Input$4.00

Output$20.0

Workload$8.00

Context1M

MiniMax-M3

Input$0.30

Output$1.20

Workload$0.54

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax-M3 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Carbon and MiniMax-M3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax-M3 Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 4 Argon vs MiniMax-M3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.