Which is better: Gemini 4 Carbon or Muse Spark 1.1?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #35) and wins 2 of 3 shared benchmarks; Muse Spark 1.1 costs less ($1.25/$4.25 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Carbon and Muse Spark 1.1 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Carbon and Muse Spark 1.1 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Carbon and Muse Spark 1.1 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Spark 1.1: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #35) and wins 2 of 3 shared benchmarks; Muse Spark 1.1 costs less ($1.25/$4.25 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Carbon model page Muse Spark 1.1 model page

Rank #5 vs #35AskClash overall scores 73.8 vs 51.6.

Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs Meta.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Spark 1.1 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Carbon	Muse Spark 1.1
Overall Score	73.8	51.6
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#35
ACB	80.8	51.3
RWT	—	7.5
Coding Agent Index	59.4	—
HLE	60.4	62.1
SWE-Pro	—	61.5
SWE-Atlas	63.7	—
Terminal-Bench	65.2	—
DeepSWE	—	53.3
GDPval-AA	1732.7	1381.0
OSWorld	—	80.8
MCP Atlas	—	88.1
Finance Agent	67.2	—
CharXiv	—	88.4
MRCR	—	54.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.00	$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$20.0	$4.25
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	8

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Spark 1.1 head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Carbon leads 3 and Muse Spark 1.1 leads 1 of 4 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 CarbonMuse Spark 1.1

Overall

73.8Gemini 4 Carbon

51.6Muse Spark 1.1

ACB

80.8Gemini 4 Carbon

51.3Muse Spark 1.1

HLE

60.4Gemini 4 Carbon

62.1Muse Spark 1.1

GDPval-AA

1732.7Gemini 4 Carbon

1381.0Muse Spark 1.1

Gemini 4 Carbon

Input$4.00

Output$20.0

Workload$8.00

Context1M

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Carbon and Muse Spark 1.1 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Carbon and Muse Spark 1.1 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.2 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.1

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.