Which is better: Gemini 4 Carbon or Qwen3.8 Max?

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #15) and wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.8 Max costs less ($2.00/$6.00 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Gemini 4 Carbon and Qwen3.8 Max side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Gemini 4 Carbon and Qwen3.8 Max compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 4 Carbon and Qwen3.8 Max when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.8 Max: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.8 Max comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 4 Carbon ranks higher (#5 vs #15) and wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.8 Max costs less ($2.00/$6.00 vs $4.00/$20.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Gemini 4 Carbon model page Qwen3.8 Max model page

Rank #5 vs #15AskClash overall scores 73.8 vs 59.6.

Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightGoogle vs Alibaba.

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.8 Max benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 4 Carbon	Qwen3.8 Max
Overall Score	73.8	59.6
Leaderboard Rank	#5	#15
ACB	80.8	69.3
Coding Agent Index	59.4	39.2
HLE	60.4	43.6
GPQA	—	92.6
IFEval	—	82.8
SWE-Pro	—	67.7
SWE-Atlas	63.7	56.2
Terminal-Bench	65.2	38.9
DeepSWE	—	69.3
GDPval-AA	1732.7	1673.7
OSWorld	—	86.1
Finance Agent	67.2	—
CharXiv	—	88.4
MMMU-Pro	—	82.7
MRCR	—	92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.00	$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$20.0	$6.00
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	14

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Qwen3.8 Max head-to-head charts

Gemini 4 Carbon leads 7 and Qwen3.8 Max leads 0 of 7 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3.8 Max

Overall

73.8Gemini 4 Carbon

59.6Qwen3.8 Max

ACB

80.8Gemini 4 Carbon

69.3Qwen3.8 Max

Coding Agent Index

59.4Gemini 4 Carbon

39.2Qwen3.8 Max

HLE

60.4Gemini 4 Carbon

43.6Qwen3.8 Max

SWE-Atlas

63.7Gemini 4 Carbon

56.2Qwen3.8 Max

Terminal-Bench

65.2Gemini 4 Carbon

38.9Qwen3.8 Max

GDPval-AA

1732.7Gemini 4 Carbon

1673.7Qwen3.8 Max

Gemini 4 Carbon

Input$4.00

Output$20.0

Workload$8.00

Context1M

Qwen3.8 Max

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 4 Carbon and Qwen3.8 Max comparisons

Explore how Gemini 4 Carbon and Qwen3.8 Max stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Carbon Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max Gemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 Max

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.