ACB
61.2 score
GLM-5.3-Flash ranks #20 on the AskClash LLM leaderboard with an overall score of 59.1. It scores 32.8 on Terminal-Bench. Compare GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.
AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.
Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.
61.2 score
8.5 score
55.3 score
91.2 score
32.8 score
63.4 score
1773.0 score
57.9 score
89.4 score
Use these comparison links to evaluate GLM-5.3-Flash against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.
Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.

Z.ai’s GLM-Legal is a legal AI model built on GLM-5.3-Flash. It scores 19.2% all-pass on Harvey’s Legal Agent Benchmark, nearly 3x its base, at $0.15 per test. Access is by application. The post Z.ai GLM-Legal Beats Claude Fable 5 and Kimi K3 on Harvey LAB app

arXiv:2610.21500v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reusing the attention KV cache across requests is a standard way to cut prefill cost in long-context LLM serving, and production systems increasingly back the per-engine cache with a remote tier shared by every e

MIT Technology Review Explains: Let our writers untangle the complex, messy world of science and technology to help you understand what’s coming next. You can read more from the series here. Late last month, Anthropic released a report arguing that the model G
Last cached leaderboard date: August 26, 2026. This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.