How do GLM-5.3 and Claude Sonnet 5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GLM-5.3 and Claude Sonnet 5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Claude Sonnet 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: GLM-5.3 or Claude Sonnet 5?

AskClash compares GLM-5.3 and Claude Sonnet 5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side GLM-5.3 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard GLM-5.3 model page Claude Sonnet 5 model page

Rank #3 vs #12AskClash overall scores 80.4 vs 69.6.

Pricing $1.40/$4.40 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryZ.AI vs Anthropic.

GLM-5.3 vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GLM-5.3	Claude Sonnet 5
Overall Score	80.4	69.6
Leaderboard Rank	#3	#12
ACB	62.2	60.8
RWT	8.5	8.5
HLE	62.5	57.4
GPQA	91.7	91.1
SWE-bench	—	85.2
SWE-Pro	—	63.2
Terminal-Bench	88.2	80.4
DeepSWE	66.9	53.8
OSWorld	—	81.2
CharXiv	—	88.3
MMMU-Pro	—	77.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.40	$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.40	$15.0
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	7	12

GLM-5.3 vs Claude Sonnet 5 head-to-head charts

GLM-5.3 leads 6 and Claude Sonnet 5 leads 0 of 7 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GLM-5.3Claude Sonnet 5

Overall

80.4GLM-5.3

69.6Claude Sonnet 5

ACB

62.2GLM-5.3

60.8Claude Sonnet 5

RWT

8.5GLM-5.3

8.5Claude Sonnet 5

HLE

62.5GLM-5.3

57.4Claude Sonnet 5

GPQA

91.7GLM-5.3

91.1Claude Sonnet 5

Terminal-Bench

88.2GLM-5.3

80.4Claude Sonnet 5

DeepSWE

66.9GLM-5.3

53.8Claude Sonnet 5

GLM-5.3

Input$1.40

Output$4.40

Workload$2.28

Context1M

Claude Sonnet 5

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GLM-5.3 and Claude Sonnet 5 comparisons

Explore how GLM-5.3 and Claude Sonnet 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3 Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3 Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM-5.3 vs Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM-5.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5 GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs Claude Sonnet 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.