Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: GLM-5.3 ranks higher (#14 vs #23) and wins 5 of 7 shared benchmarks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.60 vs $1.40/$4.40 per 1M tokens).
Rank #14 vs #23AskClash overall scores 62.5 vs 58.4.
Pricing $1.40/$4.40 vs $0.15/$0.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs APIZ.AI vs DeepSeek.
GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 62.5 | 58.4 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #14 | #23 |
| ACB | 62.2 | 63.0 |
| RWT | 8.5 | — |
| HLE | 62.5 | 36.8 |
| GPQA | 91.7 | 90.9 |
| Terminal-Bench | 41.9 | 26.8 |
| DeepSWE | 69.0 | 74.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1769.0 | 1600.0 |
| Finance Agent | 55.8 | 53.5 |
| MMMU-Pro | — | 77.0 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $1.40 | $0.15 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $4.40 | $0.60 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 10 | 11 |
GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash head-to-head charts
GLM-5.3 leads 6 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 2 of 8 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
GLM-5.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Overall
ACB
HLE
GPQA
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
GLM-5.3
Input$1.40
Output$4.40
Workload$2.28
Context1M
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparisons
Explore how GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM-5.3Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.3Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.