How do GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: GLM-5.3 or DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp?

AskClash compares GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard GLM-5.3 model page DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp model page

Rank #3 vs #19AskClash overall scores 83.1 vs 58.2.

Pricing $1.40/$4.40 vs $0.14/$0.28Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs APIZ.AI vs DeepSeek.

GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GLM-5.3	DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Overall Score	83.1	58.2
Leaderboard Rank	#3	#19
ACB	62.2	58.6
RWT	8.5	—
HLE	62.5	37.0
GPQA	91.7	91.0
SWE-bench	—	79.0
Terminal-Bench	88.2	83.9
DeepSWE	69.0	59.3
MCP Atlas	—	69.0
Finance Agent	—	49.5
MRCR	—	78.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.40	$0.14
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.40	$0.28
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	7	10

GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp head-to-head charts

GLM-5.3 leads 6 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GLM-5.3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Overall

83.1GLM-5.3

58.2DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

ACB

62.2GLM-5.3

58.6DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

HLE

62.5GLM-5.3

37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

GPQA

91.7GLM-5.3

91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Terminal-Bench

88.2GLM-5.3

83.9DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

DeepSWE

69.0GLM-5.3

59.3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

GLM-5.3

Input$1.40

Output$4.40

Workload$2.28

Context1M

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Input$0.14

Output$0.28

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp comparisons

Explore how GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3 Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3 Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GLM-5.3 vs Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GLM-5.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.