How do GLM-5.3 and Muse Spark 1.2 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GLM-5.3 and Muse Spark 1.2 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GLM-5.3 vs Muse Spark 1.2: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: GLM-5.3 or Muse Spark 1.2?

AskClash compares GLM-5.3 and Muse Spark 1.2 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side GLM-5.3 vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard GLM-5.3 model page Muse Spark 1.2 model page

Rank #3 vs #14AskClash overall scores 80.4 vs 66.8.

Pricing $1.40/$4.40 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryZ.AI vs Meta.

GLM-5.3 vs Muse Spark 1.2 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GLM-5.3	Muse Spark 1.2
Overall Score	80.4	66.8
Leaderboard Rank	#3	#14
ACB	62.2	54.8
RWT	8.5	7.5
HLE	62.5	62.1
GPQA	91.7	—
SWE-Pro	—	61.5
Terminal-Bench	88.2	80.0
DeepSWE	66.9	59.0
OSWorld	—	80.8
MCP Atlas	—	82.2
Finance Agent	—	57.2
CharXiv	—	88.4
MRCR	—	54.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.40	$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.40	$4.25
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	7	12

GLM-5.3 vs Muse Spark 1.2 head-to-head charts

GLM-5.3 leads 6 and Muse Spark 1.2 leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GLM-5.3Muse Spark 1.2

Overall

80.4GLM-5.3

66.8Muse Spark 1.2

ACB

62.2GLM-5.3

54.8Muse Spark 1.2

RWT

8.5GLM-5.3

7.5Muse Spark 1.2

HLE

62.5GLM-5.3

62.1Muse Spark 1.2

Terminal-Bench

88.2GLM-5.3

80.0Muse Spark 1.2

DeepSWE

66.9GLM-5.3

59.0Muse Spark 1.2

GLM-5.3

Input$1.40

Output$4.40

Workload$2.28

Context1M

Muse Spark 1.2

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GLM-5.3 and Muse Spark 1.2 comparisons

Explore how GLM-5.3 and Muse Spark 1.2 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 GLM-5.3 vs Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.2 GLM-5.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.2 GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark 1.2

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.