LLM Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GPT-5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #17 vs #25AskClash overall scores 62.2 vs 52.5.
Pricing $1.00/$6.00 vs $1.50/$9.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryOpenAI vs Google.

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGPT-5.6 LunaGemini 3.5 Flash
Overall Score62.252.5
Leaderboard Rank#17#25
RWT7.0
Coding Agent Index75.0
HLE40.2
GPQA92.392.2
IFEval76.3
SWE-Pro55.1
SWE-Atlas81.0
Terminal-Bench82.576.2
OSWorld78.4
MCP Atlas83.6
Finance Agent57.9
CharXiv84.2
MMMU-Pro78.483.6
ARC-AGI 259.572.1
Tau295.3
MRCR77.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.00$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$9.00
Context Window1M1M
Benchmark Cells814

More GPT-5.6 Luna and Gemini 3.5 Flash comparisons

Explore how GPT-5.6 Luna and Gemini 3.5 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.