LLM Comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #12 vs #13AskClash overall scores 65.5 vs 64.0.
Pricing $1.00/$6.00 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryOpenAI vs Alibaba.

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGPT-5.6 LunaQwen3.8 Max
Overall Score65.564.0
Leaderboard Rank#12#13
RWT9.5
Coding Agent Index75.0
HLE43.6
GPQA92.392.6
IFEval82.8
SWE-Pro62.767.7
SWE-Atlas81.0
Terminal-Bench84.786.6
DeepSWE67.256.6
OSWorld86.1
Finance Agent55.0
CharXiv88.4
MMMU-Pro78.482.3
ARC-AGI 259.5
MRCR41.392.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.00$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$6.00
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1310

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max head-to-head charts

GPT-5.6 Luna leads 2 and Qwen3.8 Max leads 5 of 7 shared benchmarks. GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GPT-5.6 LunaQwen3.8 Max
Overall
65.5GPT-5.6 Luna
64.0Qwen3.8 Max
GPQA
92.3GPT-5.6 Luna
92.6Qwen3.8 Max
SWE-Pro
62.7GPT-5.6 Luna
67.7Qwen3.8 Max
Terminal-Bench
84.7GPT-5.6 Luna
86.6Qwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE
67.2GPT-5.6 Luna
56.6Qwen3.8 Max
MMMU-Pro
78.4GPT-5.6 Luna
82.3Qwen3.8 Max
MRCR
41.3GPT-5.6 Luna
92.9Qwen3.8 Max
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input$1.00
Output$6.00
Workload$2.20
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Max
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.8 Max comparisons

Explore how GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen3.8 Max stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.