Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
GPT-6.1 Terra vs LongCat 2.0: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side GPT-6.1 Terra vs LongCat 2.0 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: GPT-6.1 Terra ranks higher (#35 vs #150) and wins 2 of 2 shared benchmarks; LongCat 2.0 costs less ($0.75/$2.95 vs $1.00/$5.00 per 1M tokens).
Rank #35 vs #150AskClash overall scores 61.7 vs 26.0.
Pricing $1.00/$5.00 vs $0.75/$2.95Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightOpenAI vs Meituan.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs LongCat 2.0 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra | LongCat 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 61.7 | 26.0 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #35 | #150 |
| ACB | 62.1 | — |
| HLE | 46.2 | 33.7 |
| GPQA | — | 88.9 |
| IFEval | — | 90.0 |
| SWE-Pro | — | 59.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 55.6 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1467.6 | 869.1 |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.7 | — |
| Tau2 | — | 88.2 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $1.00 | $0.75 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $5.00 | $2.95 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 8 | 7 |
GPT-6.1 Terra vs LongCat 2.0 head-to-head charts
GPT-6.1 Terra leads 3 and LongCat 2.0 leads 0 of 3 shared benchmarks. LongCat 2.0 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
GPT-6.1 TerraLongCat 2.0
Overall
HLE
GDPval-AA
GPT-6.1 Terra
Input$1.00
Output$5.00
Workload$2.00
Context1.05M
LongCat 2.0
Input$0.75
Output$2.95
Workload$1.34
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More GPT-6.1 Terra and LongCat 2.0 comparisons
Explore how GPT-6.1 Terra and LongCat 2.0 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat 2.0Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Opus 5.5 vs LongCat 2.0Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Fable 5.1 vs LongCat 2.0Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs LongCat 2.0Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Opus 5 vs LongCat 2.0
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.