How do Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.6-27B compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.6-27B when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.6-27B?

AskClash compares Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.6-27B side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Grok 4.5 model page Qwen3.6-27B model page

Rank #10 vs #34AskClash overall scores 70.1 vs 42.4.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0/$0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightxAI vs Alibaba.

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Grok 4.5	Qwen3.6-27B
Overall Score	70.1	42.4
Leaderboard Rank	#10	#34
RWT	9.0	—
Coding Agent Index	76.4	—
HLE	40.3	24.0
GPQA	93.1	87.8
SWE-bench	—	77.2
SWE-Pro	64.7	—
SWE-Atlas	83.9	—
Terminal-Bench	83.3	59.3
Finance Agent	48.3	—
CharXiv	—	78.4
MMMU-Pro	80.4	75.8
ARC-AGI 2	52.6	—
Tau2	—	94.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$0
Context Window	500K	262K
Benchmarks Published	12	7

Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B head-to-head charts

Grok 4.5 leads 5 and Qwen3.6-27B leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6-27B is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Grok 4.5Qwen3.6-27B

Overall

70.1Grok 4.5

42.4Qwen3.6-27B

HLE

40.3Grok 4.5

24.0Qwen3.6-27B

GPQA

93.1Grok 4.5

87.8Qwen3.6-27B

Terminal-Bench

83.3Grok 4.5

59.3Qwen3.6-27B

MMMU-Pro

80.4Grok 4.5

75.8Qwen3.6-27B

Grok 4.5

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context500K

Qwen3.6-27B

Input$0

Output$0

Workload$0.00

Context262K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.6-27B comparisons

Explore how Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.6-27B stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.5 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.6-27B Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.6-27B GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.6-27B Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.6-27B Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.5 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-27B

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.