How do Hy3 and Composer 2.5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Hy3 and Composer 2.5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Hy3 vs Composer 2.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Hy3 or Composer 2.5?

AskClash compares Hy3 and Composer 2.5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Hy3 vs Composer 2.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Hy3 model page Composer 2.5 model page

Rank #17 vs #32AskClash overall scores 58.7 vs 44.4.

Pricing $0.12/$0.43 vs $0.50/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryTencent vs Cursor.

Hy3 vs Composer 2.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Hy3	Composer 2.5
Overall Score	58.7	44.4
Leaderboard Rank	#17	#32
RWT	8.0	8.5
Coding Agent Index	—	62.9
HLE	53.2	—
GPQA	90.4	—
SWE-bench	78.0	—
SWE-Pro	57.9	49.2
SWE-Atlas	—	72.5
Terminal-Bench	71.7	69.3
MCP Atlas	79.1	—
Tau2	92.7	—
MRCR	75.1	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.12	$0.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.43	$2.50
Context Window	256K	200K
Benchmarks Published	9	5

Hy3 vs Composer 2.5 head-to-head charts

Hy3 leads 3 and Composer 2.5 leads 1 of 4 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Hy3Composer 2.5

Overall

58.7Hy3

44.4Composer 2.5

RWT

8.0Hy3

8.5Composer 2.5

SWE-Pro

57.9Hy3

49.2Composer 2.5

Terminal-Bench

71.7Hy3

69.3Composer 2.5

Hy3

Input$0.12

Output$0.43

Workload$0.21

Context256K

Composer 2.5

Input$0.50

Output$2.50

Workload$1.00

Context200K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Hy3 and Composer 2.5 comparisons

Explore how Hy3 and Composer 2.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Hy3 Claude Opus 5 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 Claude Fable 5 vs Composer 2.5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Hy3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Composer 2.5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy3 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Composer 2.5 Kimi K3 vs Hy3 Kimi K3 vs Composer 2.5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.