LLM Comparison

Hy3 vs SWE-1.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Hy3 vs SWE-1.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardHy3 model pageSWE-1.7 model page
Rank #15 vs #44AskClash overall scores 63.6 vs 28.8.
Pricing $0.12/$0.43 vs $0/$0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryTencent vs Cognition.

Hy3 vs SWE-1.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricHy3SWE-1.7
Overall Score63.628.8
Leaderboard Rank#15#44
RWT—9.0
HLE53.2—
GPQA90.4—
SWE-bench78.0—
SWE-Pro57.9—
Terminal-Bench71.781.5
MCP Atlas79.1—
Tau292.7—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.12$0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.43$0
Context Window256K256K
Benchmark Cells81

More Hy3 and SWE-1.7 comparisons

Explore how Hy3 and SWE-1.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Mythos Fable 5 vs Hy3Claude Mythos Fable 5 vs SWE-1.7Sakana Fugu Ultra vs Hy3Sakana Fugu Ultra vs SWE-1.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy3Claude Opus 4.8 vs SWE-1.7GLM-5.2 vs Hy3GLM-5.2 vs SWE-1.7Claude Sonnet 5 vs Hy3Claude Sonnet 5 vs SWE-1.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.