LLM Comparison

LongCat 2.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side LongCat 2.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #10 vs #16AskClash overall scores 72.3 vs 58.0.
Pricing $0.75/$2.95 vs $1.50/$9.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryMeituan vs Google.

LongCat 2.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricLongCat 2.0Gemini 3.5 Flash
Overall Score72.358.0
Leaderboard Rank#10#16
RWT7.0
HLE40.2
GPQA88.992.2
IFEval90.076.3
SWE-Pro59.555.1
Terminal-Bench70.876.2
OSWorld78.4
MCP Atlas83.6
Finance Agent57.9
CharXiv84.2
MMMU-Pro83.6
ARC-AGI 272.1
Tau295.3
MRCR77.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.75$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$2.95$9.00
Context Window1M1M
Benchmark Cells414

More LongCat 2.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash comparisons

Explore how LongCat 2.0 and Gemini 3.5 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.