Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
LongCat 2.0 vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side LongCat 2.0 vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Rank #9 vs #12AskClash overall scores 67.9 vs 65.0.
Pricing $0.75/$2.95 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightMeituan vs Tencent.
LongCat 2.0 vs Hy3 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 67.9 | 65.0 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #9 | #12 |
| HLE | — | 53.2 |
| GPQA | 88.9 | 90.4 |
| IFEval | 90.0 | — |
| SWE-bench | — | 78.0 |
| SWE-Pro | 59.5 | 57.9 |
| Terminal-Bench | 70.8 | 71.7 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 79.1 |
| Tau2 | 88.2 | 92.7 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.75 | $0.12 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.95 | $0.43 |
| Context Window | 1M | 256K |
| Benchmark Cells | 5 | 8 |
More LongCat 2.0 and Hy3 comparisons
Explore how LongCat 2.0 and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.