LLM Comparison

LongCat 2.0 vs SWE-1.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side LongCat 2.0 vs SWE-1.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardLongCat 2.0 model pageSWE-1.7 model page
Rank #13 vs #44AskClash overall scores 66.4 vs 28.8.
Pricing $0.75/$2.95 vs $0/$0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryMeituan vs Cognition.

LongCat 2.0 vs SWE-1.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricLongCat 2.0SWE-1.7
Overall Score66.428.8
Leaderboard Rank#13#44
RWT—9.0
GPQA88.9—
IFEval90.0—
SWE-Pro59.5—
Terminal-Bench70.881.5
Tau288.2—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.75$0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$2.95$0
Context Window1M256K
Benchmark Cells51

More LongCat 2.0 and SWE-1.7 comparisons

Explore how LongCat 2.0 and SWE-1.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Mythos Fable 5 vs LongCat 2.0Claude Mythos Fable 5 vs SWE-1.7Sakana Fugu Ultra vs LongCat 2.0Sakana Fugu Ultra vs SWE-1.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs LongCat 2.0Claude Opus 4.8 vs SWE-1.7GLM-5.2 vs LongCat 2.0GLM-5.2 vs SWE-1.7Claude Sonnet 5 vs LongCat 2.0Claude Sonnet 5 vs SWE-1.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.