LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.3 Codex: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.3 Codex comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #8 vs #30AskClash overall scores 66.7 vs 56.6.
Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $1.75/$14.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs OpenAI.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.3 Codex benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricMuse Spark 1.3GPT-5.3 Codex
Overall Score66.756.6
Leaderboard Rank#8#30
ACB62.6
RWT7.58.0
Coding Agent Index54.3
HLE49.142.5
GPQA93.891.5
IFEval75.4
SWE-bench85.0
SWE-Pro56.8
SWE-Atlas59.4
Terminal-Bench88.877.3
DeepSWE75.4
GDPval-AA1754.0
OSWorld64.7
Finance Agent58.9
MMMU-Pro78.5
Tau286.0
MRCR98.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.25$1.75
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$4.25$14.0
Context Window1M400K
Benchmarks Published1110

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.3 Codex head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 4 and GPT-5.3 Codex leads 1 of 5 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.3GPT-5.3 Codex
Overall
66.7Muse Spark 1.3
56.6GPT-5.3 Codex
RWT
7.5Muse Spark 1.3
8.0GPT-5.3 Codex
HLE
49.1Muse Spark 1.3
42.5GPT-5.3 Codex
GPQA
93.8Muse Spark 1.3
91.5GPT-5.3 Codex
Terminal-Bench
88.8Muse Spark 1.3
77.3GPT-5.3 Codex
Muse Spark 1.3
Input$1.25
Output$4.25
Workload$2.10
Context1M
GPT-5.3 Codex
Input$1.75
Output$14.0
Workload$4.55
Context400K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.3 and GPT-5.3 Codex comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.3 and GPT-5.3 Codex stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.