ACB
62.3 score
Muse Wonder ranks #11 on the AskClash LLM leaderboard with an overall score of 64.7. It scores 52.0 on Terminal-Bench. Compare Muse Wonder vs GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, open-weight, and frontier AI models using public benchmark scores, token pricing, context window, and access details.
AskClash combines public LLM benchmark cells into a weighted percentile score and penalizes missing coverage so narrow rows do not dominate better-measured models.
Cached benchmark values can include HLE, GPQA, SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, ARC-AGI-2, Tau2, and model-specific coding or agent scores.
62.3 score
50.1 score
52.0 score
78.8 score
1770.3 score
56.6 score
Use these comparison links to evaluate Muse Wonder against nearby LLMs by benchmark score, price, context window, and provider.
Cached AskClash article matches that can provide release, provider, benchmark, pricing, or market context around this model.

Meta's new Muse Wonder models rank in the top three on six out of ten benchmarks, with the biggest gains in agentic tasks. But the cost per task has nearly tripled. The article Meta's new frontier model Muse Wonder Full breaks into the AI top tier appeared fir
Meta said it would release a report detailing additional safety evaluations of the models at a later date. It has not provided benchmark results or comparisons with rival models in its announcement.Content provided by Seeking Alpha is intended for information

TechCrunch

@artificialanlys : Muse Wonder Full (max) outperforms Fable 5.1 (max) on Artificial Analysis' Intelligence Index, matches Sonnet 5.5 (max), and is just shy of Opus 5.5 (max) — Meta has released Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, achieving Artificial Analysis In
Last cached leaderboard date: October 12, 2026. This model page is generated from the AskClash LLM Leaderboard cache and linked from the live leaderboard.