LLM Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Qwen3.7 Max ranks higher (#105 vs #143) and wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks; Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs less ($0.30/$2.50 vs $2.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardQwen3.7 Max model pageGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page
Rank #105 vs #143AskClash overall scores 48.5 vs 26.1.
Pricing $2.50/$7.50 vs $0.30/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Google.

Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.7 MaxGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall Score48.526.1
Leaderboard Rank#105#143
RWT7.57.0
HLE41.418.8
GPQA92.483.8
IFEval94.3—
SWE-bench80.4—
SWE-Pro—54.2
GDPval-AA1546.01140.0
OSWorld—74.0
MCP Atlas76.4—
Finance Agent48.447.4
MMMU-Pro—79.0
Tau294.7—
MRCR90.472.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$2.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published89

Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite head-to-head charts

Qwen3.7 Max leads 7 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 0 of 7 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.7 MaxGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall
48.5Qwen3.7 Max
26.1Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
RWT
7.5Qwen3.7 Max
7.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
HLE
41.4Qwen3.7 Max
18.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
GPQA
92.4Qwen3.7 Max
83.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
GDPval-AA
1546.0Qwen3.7 Max
1140.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Finance Agent
48.4Qwen3.7 Max
47.4Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
MRCR
90.4Qwen3.7 Max
72.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Qwen3.7 Max
Input$2.50
Output$7.50
Workload$4.00
Context1M
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input$0.30
Output$2.50
Workload$0.80
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.7 Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.7 Max and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.